NEW SITE SHOWS BRANDIS AND SHORTEN SSM BILLS CREATE GENDER-FLUID MARRIAGE
Are the concerns expressed by ‘No’ campaigners, like Mr Abbott and Mr Latham, valid?
The Australian Family Association has launched a new site that shows they are valid, and explains how with brief (and extended) Q and A sections.
Launched today in the wake of the High Court decision, TransgenderMarriageVote.com.au explains why there is a mismatch between the postal survey question and the bills put forward in parliament.
“Attorney General George Brandis is wrong to claim the postal survey is only about ‘allowing same sex couples to marry’. His own department has confirmed that non-binary gender identities are included if marriage is redefined as the union of any 2 people,” said Patrick Byrne researcher for the Australian Family Association.
“Our new site claims upfront that, ‘It’s really transgender marriage, no matter what the postal ballot says’ and then explains how this is possible,” said Mr Byrne.
“What this means is schools would have to teach kids that your gender can be fluid, that marriage can be gender-fluid, (e.g. Pangender married to Astralgender) and boys who identify more as a girl can use the girls’ facilities,” said Mr Byrne.
See all the claims and references at www.TransgenderMarriageVote.com.au.